with $100k coming in, swapping out of Worcester

change
Chicago, IL cityscape

instead of worcester

Chicago

il · metro 9.3M

a dispatch from

chicago

IL

41.88°N

87.63°W

Chicago is deep-dish for tourists, thin-crust tavern style for locals, and a hot dog that absolutely will not have ketchup on it. The L rumbles overhead, the lakefront stretches for 18 unbroken miles of beach and trail, and the architecture boat tour is the single best $50 you'll spend. Summer in Chicago might be the best summer in America. The improv comedy gene pool is unmatched.

metro9.3M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$26

the monthly premium over Worcester

Almost a wash on cost. The case for Chicago is about what you'd do there, not what you'd save.
landable, recorded on the chicago entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$2,170/mo

1% more expensive than Worcester(vs $2,140/mo)

02state income tax

4.95%

$4/mo less in state tax than Worcester

vs 5% in Worcester

03after rent

$5,751/mo

$26 less than Worcester

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$365k

25% cheaper than Worcester

vs $486k in Worcester

05metro size

9.3M

vs 867k in Worcester

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

153

pleasant days a year, in chicago.

Worcester barely cracks 148 pleasant ones.

A real upgrade on things to do: 43.2× Worcester's pace.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

70/100

19% higher than Worcester

vs 59/100 in Worcester

Closest outdoor draw: Indiana Dunes National Park, 27.2 mi.

·walk score®

100/100

11% higher than Worcester

vs 90/100 in Worcester

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

217

10750% more than Worcester

vs 2 nonstops in Worcester

04 · see also

neighbors of chicago on the map of tradeoffs:

compare chicago with: