on $100k a year, leaving Worcester

change
Minneapolis, MN cityscape

instead of worcester

Minneapolis

mn · metro 3.7M

photo: Bl∡ke / pexels

a dispatch from

minneapolis

MN

44.98°N

93.27°W

Minneapolis is 22 lakes inside city limits, an extensive skyway system that lets you cross downtown in February without a coat, and a music legacy that runs from Prince to The Replacements. Summer is a glorious lake-jumping, ice-cream-licking festival. Winter is sauna-and-skate season, with rinks on every lake and cross-country trails stitched through the city. Walleye is on every menu.

metro3.7M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$223

below Worcester's monthly cost

Minneapolis gives you room Worcester doesn't. Same gross salary, lower monthly cost of living.
landable, recorded on the minneapolis entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$1,679/mo

22% cheaper than Worcester(vs $2,140/mo)

02state income tax

7.85%

$237/mo more in state tax than Worcester

vs 5% in Worcester

03after rent

$6,000/mo

$223 more than Worcester

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$398k

18% cheaper than Worcester

vs $486k in Worcester

05metro size

3.7M

vs 867k in Worcester

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

147

pleasant days a year, in minneapolis.

Worcester actually gets more: 148 pleasant days a year. The trade is winter: 84 days below 20°, vs 55 in Worcester.

A month here packs 5.2× the events of Worcester.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

76/100

29% higher than Worcester

vs 59/100 in Worcester

Closest outdoor draw: Fort Snelling State Park, 9.1 mi.

·walk score®

93/100

3% higher than Worcester

vs 90/100 in Worcester

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

130

6400% more than Worcester

vs 2 nonstops in Worcester

04 · see also

if minneapolis appeals, also worth a look:

compare minneapolis with: