on $100k a year, leaving Lancaster

change
Riverside, CA cityscape

instead of lancaster

Riverside

ca · metro 4.7M

a dispatch from

riverside

CA

33.98°N

117.37°W

Riverside is where the navel orange got its start in America, with the parent tree from 1873 still alive and producing fruit on a downtown corner. The Mission Inn is a wildly ornate Spanish Revival hotel that hosts the country's biggest holiday lights festival. Riverside's downtown is genuinely walkable, with citrus groves still scattered through the foothills. Summers are dry and bright, with the foothills cooling the evenings.

metro4.7M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,496

pricier each month than Lancaster

Riverside is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the riverside entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$2,493/mo

64% more expensive than Lancaster(vs $1,517/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$519/mo more in state tax than Lancaster

vs 3.07% in Lancaster

03after rent

$5,065/mo

$1,496 less than Lancaster

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$595k

55% more expensive than Lancaster

vs $384k in Lancaster

05metro size

4.7M

vs 559k in Lancaster

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

249

pleasant days a year, in riverside.

Lancaster barely cracks 158 pleasant ones. Heat is the cost: 47 days top 95° vs Lancaster's 3.

But the calendar thins out: Lancaster stays 2.5× busier.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

69/100

10% higher than Lancaster

vs 63/100 in Lancaster

Closest outdoor draw: San Bernardino National Forest, 17.9 mi.

·walk score®

92/100

5% lower than Lancaster

vs 97/100 in Lancaster

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

14

1300% more than Lancaster

vs 1 nonstops in Lancaster

04 · see also

if riverside appeals, also worth a look: