on $100k a year, leaving Worcester

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

instead of worcester

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,365

more each month than Worcester ran you

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

47% more expensive than Worcester(vs $2,140/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$358/mo more in state tax than Worcester

vs 5% in Worcester

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$1,365 less than Worcester

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

155% more expensive than Worcester

vs $486k in Worcester

05metro size

4.6M

vs 867k in Worcester

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Worcester barely cracks 148 pleasant ones.

760% more happening than in Worcester.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

41% higher than Worcester

vs 59/100 in Worcester

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

10% higher than Worcester

vs 90/100 in Worcester

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

5450% more than Worcester

vs 2 nonstops in Worcester

04 · see also

cities that play in san francisco's register:

compare san francisco with: