on $100k a year, leaving Reading

change
St. Louis, MO cityscape

swapping out of reading

St. Louis

mo · metro 2.8M

photo: James L / pexels

a dispatch from

st. louis

MO

38.63°N

90.20°W

St. Louis has the Arch (catenary curve and engineering marvel), Forest Park (bigger than Central Park and home to a free zoo, art museum, and history museum), and toasted ravioli, which was invented here. The Cardinals are a religion, the Hill neighborhood is wall-to-wall Italian red sauce, and Imo's makes pizza with Provel cheese that locals defend furiously. The skyline at sunset is underrated.

metro2.8M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$69

pricier each month than Reading

Almost a wash on cost. The case for St. Louis is about what you'd do there, not what you'd save.
landable, recorded on the st. louis entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$1,411/mo

5% cheaper than Reading(vs $1,478/mo)

02state income tax

4.7%

$136/mo more in state tax than Reading

vs 3.07% in Reading

03after rent

$6,531/mo

$69 less than Reading

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$277k

11% cheaper than Reading

vs $311k in Reading

05metro size

2.8M

vs 433k in Reading

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

174

pleasant days a year, in st. louis.

Reading barely cracks 157 pleasant ones.

Nights and weekends fill up faster. 2.8× more on the calendar than Reading.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

68/100

5% higher than Reading

vs 65/100 in Reading

Closest outdoor draw: Gateway Arch National Park, 0.7 mi.

·walk score®

87/100

2% higher than Reading

vs 85/100 in Reading

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

60

0% fewer than Reading

vs 0 nonstops in Reading

04 · see also

if st. louis appeals, also worth a look:

compare st. louis with: