$100k a year, no longer in Roanoke

change
St. Louis, MO cityscape

instead of roanoke

St. Louis

mo · metro 2.8M

photo: James L / pexels

a dispatch from

st. louis

MO

38.63°N

90.20°W

St. Louis has the Arch (catenary curve and engineering marvel), Forest Park (bigger than Central Park and home to a free zoo, art museum, and history museum), and toasted ravioli, which was invented here. The Cardinals are a religion, the Hill neighborhood is wall-to-wall Italian red sauce, and Imo's makes pizza with Provel cheese that locals defend furiously. The skyline at sunset is underrated.

metro2.8M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$59

less monthly outlay than Roanoke

St. Louis and Roanoke land close on cost. The reasons to move are about how you'd live, not what you'd save.
landable, recorded on the st. louis entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$1,411/mo

2% more expensive than Roanoke(vs $1,382/mo)

02state income tax

4.7%

$88/mo less in state tax than Roanoke

vs 5.75% in Roanoke

03after rent

$6,531/mo

$59 more than Roanoke

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$277k

7% cheaper than Roanoke

vs $296k in Roanoke

05metro size

2.8M

vs 314k in Roanoke

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

174

pleasant days a year, in st. louis.

Roanoke actually gets more: 179 pleasant days a year.

567% more happening than in Roanoke.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

68/100

1% lower than Roanoke

vs 69/100 in Roanoke

Closest outdoor draw: Gateway Arch National Park, 0.7 mi.

·walk score®

87/100

7% lower than Roanoke

vs 94/100 in Roanoke

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

60

567% more than Roanoke

vs 9 nonstops in Roanoke

04 · see also

if st. louis appeals, also worth a look:

compare st. louis with: