$100k a year, no longer in Lancaster

change
Los Angeles, CA cityscape

instead of lancaster

Los Angeles

ca · metro 12.8M

a dispatch from

los angeles

CA

34.05°N

118.24°W

Los Angeles is 88 cities pretending to be one, connected by freeways and a shared love of really good tacos. Every neighborhood is its own scene: surfers in Venice, the Korean grandmas of K-town, mountains rising behind Pasadena, Persian rugs in Westwood. The light at golden hour is so good it makes Instagram filters jealous. Roll the windows down at golden hour, put on a playlist, and let the city stretch out.

metro12.8M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,902

the monthly cost of moving past Lancaster

Los Angeles costs noticeably more than Lancaster. You'd be paying for Los Angeles itself, not for breathing room around it.
landable, recorded on the los angeles entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$2,899/mo

91% more expensive than Lancaster(vs $1,517/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$519/mo more in state tax than Lancaster

vs 3.07% in Lancaster

03after rent

$4,659/mo

$1,902 less than Lancaster

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1029k

168% more expensive than Lancaster

vs $384k in Lancaster

05metro size

12.8M

vs 559k in Lancaster

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

283

pleasant days a year, in los angeles.

Lancaster only manages 158 of those.

A real upgrade on things to do: 23.2× Lancaster's pace.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

67/100

6% higher than Lancaster

vs 63/100 in Lancaster

Closest outdoor draw: Channel Islands National Park, 61.5 mi.

·walk score®

96/100

1% lower than Lancaster

vs 97/100 in Lancaster

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

150

14900% more than Lancaster

vs 1 nonstops in Lancaster

04 · see also

in the same ballpark as los angeles:

compare los angeles with: