on $100k a year, leaving Raleigh

change
Los Angeles, CA cityscape

from raleigh

Los Angeles

ca · metro 12.8M

a dispatch from

los angeles

CA

34.05°N

118.24°W

Los Angeles is 88 cities pretending to be one, connected by freeways and a shared love of really good tacos. Every neighborhood is its own scene: surfers in Venice, the Korean grandmas of K-town, mountains rising behind Pasadena, Persian rugs in Westwood. The light at golden hour is so good it makes Instagram filters jealous. Roll the windows down at golden hour, put on a playlist, and let the city stretch out.

metro12.8M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,636

pricier each month than Raleigh

Los Angeles is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the los angeles entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$2,899/mo

74% more expensive than Raleigh(vs $1,663/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$400/mo more in state tax than Raleigh

vs 4.5% in Raleigh

03after rent

$4,659/mo

$1,636 less than Raleigh

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1029k

134% more expensive than Raleigh

vs $440k in Raleigh

05metro size

12.8M

vs 1.5M in Raleigh

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

283

pleasant days a year, in los angeles.

Raleigh barely cracks 201 pleasant ones.

A real upgrade on things to do: 7.4× Raleigh's pace.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

67/100

16% higher than Raleigh

vs 58/100 in Raleigh

Closest outdoor draw: Channel Islands National Park, 61.5 mi.

·walk score®

96/100

1% lower than Raleigh

vs 97/100 in Raleigh

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

150

285% more than Raleigh

vs 39 nonstops in Raleigh

04 · see also

neighbors of los angeles on the map of tradeoffs:

compare los angeles with: