on $100k a year, leaving Charleston

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

instead of charleston

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,393

more each month than Charleston ran you

A real premium for San Francisco. Worth it only if the city itself is the whole point.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

58% more expensive than Charleston(vs $1,987/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$233/mo more in state tax than Charleston

vs 6.5% in Charleston

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$1,393 less than Charleston

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

187% more expensive than Charleston

vs $432k in Charleston

05metro size

4.6M

vs 849k in Charleston

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Charleston keeps to 212 pleasant days a year.

A month here packs 6.3× the events of Charleston.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

24% higher than Charleston

vs 67/100 in Charleston

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

8% higher than Charleston

vs 92/100 in Charleston

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

455% more than Charleston

vs 20 nonstops in Charleston

04 · see also

in the same ballpark as san francisco:

compare san francisco with: