with $100k coming in, swapping out of Columbus

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

if you left columbus

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,200

more expensive each month than Columbus

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

149% more expensive than Columbus(vs $1,264/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$318/mo more in state tax than Columbus

vs 5.49% in Columbus

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,200 less than Columbus

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

496% more expensive than Columbus

vs $208k in Columbus

05metro size

4.6M

vs 329k in Columbus

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Columbus barely cracks 177 pleasant ones.

1022% more happening than in Columbus.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

77% higher than Columbus

vs 47/100 in Columbus

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

27% higher than Columbus

vs 78/100 in Columbus

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

11000% more than Columbus

vs 1 nonstops in Columbus

04 · see also

same energy as san francisco, different zip code:

compare san francisco with: