same $100k income, fresh start from Harrisburg

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

if you left harrisburg

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,220

more expensive each month than Harrisburg

San Francisco doesn't pretend to be affordable. Move here for what San Francisco is, not for what it leaves on your monthly ledger.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

118% more expensive than Harrisburg(vs $1,446/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$519/mo more in state tax than Harrisburg

vs 3.07% in Harrisburg

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,220 less than Harrisburg

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

301% more expensive than Harrisburg

vs $309k in Harrisburg

05metro size

4.6M

vs 606k in Harrisburg

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Harrisburg barely cracks 152 pleasant ones.

682% more happening than in Harrisburg.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

20% higher than Harrisburg

vs 69/100 in Harrisburg

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

6% higher than Harrisburg

vs 93/100 in Harrisburg

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

825% more than Harrisburg

vs 12 nonstops in Harrisburg

04 · see also

neighbors of san francisco on the map of tradeoffs:

compare san francisco with: