on $100k a year, leaving Lakeland

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

next stop after lakeland

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,087

pricier each month than Lakeland

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

72% more expensive than Lakeland(vs $1,834/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$775/mo more in state tax than Lakeland

vs 0% in Lakeland

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,087 less than Lakeland

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

311% more expensive than Lakeland

vs $301k in Lakeland

05metro size

4.6M

vs 818k in Lakeland

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Lakeland only logs 206 pleasant days.

21.5× the events of Lakeland, and the calendar shows it.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

73% higher than Lakeland

vs 48/100 in Lakeland

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

50% higher than Lakeland

vs 66/100 in Lakeland

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

63% more than Lakeland

vs 68 nonstops in Lakeland

04 · see also

neighbors of san francisco on the map of tradeoffs:

compare san francisco with: