with $100k coming in, swapping out of Lancaster

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

if you left lancaster

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,149

more expensive each month than Lancaster

San Francisco doesn't pretend to be affordable. Move here for what San Francisco is, not for what it leaves on your monthly ledger.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

107% more expensive than Lancaster(vs $1,517/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$519/mo more in state tax than Lancaster

vs 3.07% in Lancaster

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,149 less than Lancaster

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

223% more expensive than Lancaster

vs $384k in Lancaster

05metro size

4.6M

vs 559k in Lancaster

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Lancaster only logs 158 pleasant days.

A real upgrade on things to do: 17.2× Lancaster's pace.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

32% higher than Lancaster

vs 63/100 in Lancaster

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

2% higher than Lancaster

vs 97/100 in Lancaster

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

11000% more than Lancaster

vs 1 nonstops in Lancaster

04 · see also

same energy as san francisco, different zip code:

compare san francisco with: