on $100k a year, leaving Manchester

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

if you left manchester

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,829

pricier each month than Manchester

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

50% more expensive than Manchester(vs $2,092/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$775/mo more in state tax than Manchester

vs 0% in Manchester

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$1,829 less than Manchester

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

126% more expensive than Manchester

vs $548k in Manchester

05metro size

4.6M

vs 427k in Manchester

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Manchester barely cracks 154 pleasant ones.

Nights and weekends fill up faster. 17.2× more on the calendar than Manchester.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

34% higher than Manchester

vs 62/100 in Manchester

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

1% higher than Manchester

vs 98/100 in Manchester

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

754% more than Manchester

vs 13 nonstops in Manchester

04 · see also

neighbors of san francisco on the map of tradeoffs:

compare san francisco with: