$100k salary, packing up from Minneapolis

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

from minneapolis

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,588

the monthly premium over Minneapolis

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

87% more expensive than Minneapolis(vs $1,679/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$121/mo more in state tax than Minneapolis

vs 7.85% in Minneapolis

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$1,588 less than Minneapolis

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

211% more expensive than Minneapolis

vs $398k in Minneapolis

05metro size

4.6M

vs 3.7M in Minneapolis

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Minneapolis barely cracks 147 pleasant ones.

64% more happening than in Minneapolis.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

9% higher than Minneapolis

vs 76/100 in Minneapolis

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

6% higher than Minneapolis

vs 93/100 in Minneapolis

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

15% fewer than Minneapolis

vs 130 nonstops in Minneapolis

04 · see also

if san francisco appeals, also worth a look:

compare san francisco with: