with $100k coming in, swapping out of Pittsburgh

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

instead of pittsburgh

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,193

more expensive each month than Pittsburgh

San Francisco costs noticeably more than Pittsburgh. You'd be paying for San Francisco itself, not for breathing room around it.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

114% more expensive than Pittsburgh(vs $1,473/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$519/mo more in state tax than Pittsburgh

vs 3.07% in Pittsburgh

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,193 less than Pittsburgh

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

456% more expensive than Pittsburgh

vs $223k in Pittsburgh

05metro size

4.6M

vs 2.4M in Pittsburgh

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Pittsburgh only manages 161 of those.

Nights and weekends fill up faster. 3.3× more on the calendar than Pittsburgh.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

20% higher than Pittsburgh

vs 69/100 in Pittsburgh

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

0% lower than Pittsburgh

vs 99/100 in Pittsburgh

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

200% more than Pittsburgh

vs 37 nonstops in Pittsburgh

04 · see also

in the same ballpark as san francisco:

compare san francisco with: