$100k a year, no longer in Rochester

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

from rochester

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$1,900

more each month than Rochester ran you

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

105% more expensive than Rochester(vs $1,534/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$287/mo more in state tax than Rochester

vs 5.85% in Rochester

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$1,900 less than Rochester

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

353% more expensive than Rochester

vs $273k in Rochester

05metro size

4.6M

vs 1.1M in Rochester

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

Rochester barely cracks 147 pleasant ones.

Nights and weekends fill up faster. 8.6× more on the calendar than Rochester.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

43% higher than Rochester

vs 58/100 in Rochester

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

43% higher than Rochester

vs 69/100 in Rochester

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

517% more than Rochester

vs 18 nonstops in Rochester

04 · see also

if san francisco appeals, also worth a look:

compare san francisco with: