with $100k coming in, swapping out of St. Louis

change
San Francisco, CA cityscape

instead of st. louis

San Francisco

ca · metro 4.6M

a dispatch from

san francisco

CA

37.77°N

122.42°W

San Francisco is hills, fog, Mission burritos the size of forearms, and pastel Victorians stacked like dominoes. Karl the Fog has his own Instagram, the cable cars are still mechanically pulled by cables running under the street, and the Pacific shows up at the end of every west-bound avenue. The food is wildly good, the views are theatrical, and yes, you'll get cardio just walking to the corner store.

metro4.6M

01 · the verdict

the verdict

$2,119

more expensive each month than St. Louis

San Francisco is the expensive option. The argument has to be entirely about the place, not the price.
landable, recorded on the san francisco entry

02 · the money

a quick ledger.

01rent

$3,146/mo

123% more expensive than St. Louis(vs $1,411/mo)

02state income tax

9.3%

$383/mo more in state tax than St. Louis

vs 4.7% in St. Louis

03after rent

$4,412/mo

$2,119 less than St. Louis

gross of federal tax. a comparison, not a paycheck.

04a house here

$1239k

348% more expensive than St. Louis

vs $277k in St. Louis

05metro size

4.6M

vs 2.8M in St. Louis

03 · the life

field notes, weather & such.

312

pleasant days a year, in san francisco.

St. Louis only logs 174 pleasant days.

3.2× the events of St. Louis, and the calendar shows it.
on a typical month
·outdoorscore

83/100

22% higher than St. Louis

vs 68/100 in St. Louis

Closest outdoor draw: Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 1.5 mi.

·walk score®

99/100

14% higher than St. Louis

vs 87/100 in St. Louis

Walk Score® methodology

·nonstops

111

85% more than St. Louis

vs 60 nonstops in St. Louis

04 · see also

same energy as san francisco, different zip code:

compare san francisco with: